|
October
22, 2004
To:
Honorable Governor Joseph Kernan,
Distinguished
Members of the Indiana
General Assembly
From:
Citizens of Indiana opposed to the new
terrain I-69
We write
to voice our strenuous opposition to the
new
terrain I-69 highway and growing resolve to compel you, our state's
political
leaders, to stop this outrageous assault on the peace of mind and
future of so
many hardworking Hoosiers. Our
numbers are growing daily. More voting taxpayers are becoming aware of
the $2.5
billion price tag of this highway, its limited benefits, and the
destruction it will bring to these
Hoosiers, homes, farms, businesses, and rural communities, as well as
the
natural heritage of all Hoosiers, and its direct relation to special
interests.
The new
terrain I-69 will cost $2.5 billion.
Building it
will bring most, if not all, other road construction in Indiana to a
halt
without a major increase in gas taxes.
We are at a complete loss to understand why the
state insists on
consigning virtually its entire budget for new roads to one road that
its own
facts clearly do not justify.
How can
'fiscally responsible' public officials
sink $2.5
billion on an interstate that, according to their own 2003
Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS), will save 12 minutes in travel time over the
alternative of
upgrading US 41 and I-70, particularly when this alternative will cost
less
than half as much and avoid this destruction?
Why is
the state trying to build a new highway
across
southwest Indiana that, according to the exhaustive Southwest Indiana
Highway
Feasibility Study of 1988, will draw as much as 40 percent of the
current
traffic away from businesses and local economies along US 41? Governor,
the
businesses and economies along US 41 are more depressed than businesses
and
local economies that will be displaced or destroyed by the new highway!
Furthermore,
what are the grounds for asserting
the new
terrain highway is needed for economic prosperity in any corridor,
given that
the EIS found that real disposable income for those living near the new
highway
will not differ significantly from their income if no new highway were
built at
all?
According
to the EIS, the new terrain highway will
wipe out
400 homes, 76 non-farm businesses, 5,100 acres of farms, and 1,740
acres of
forest and wetlands. Numerous
threatened and endangered species that the government spends money to
protect,
in places such as the Patoka National Wildlife Refuge, will be placed
further
at risk by the highway, an impact that would be avoided entirely by an
interstate along US 41.
You have
yet to answer any of these questions,
Governor.
It is the
human environment that will suffer
perhaps the
most from building a new-terrain interstate. Instead
of building the interstate in an established highway
corridor where the impacts of highway traffic and related development
already
occur, the promoters of the new terrain I-69 want to use our
transportation
dollars to invade and erase a pristine rural landscape that is growing
increasingly scarce in our beloved Indiana. Air quality in this new
travel
corridor will deteriorate with huge increases in truck and car traffic. Noise and light pollution will increase
dramatically. Highway accidents,
fatalities and injuries will increase, not decrease.
Some 135 roads will be closed, impairing school bus
routes,
emergency response times, and local travel, as well as increasing
safety
problems and costs to counties and businesses. All
of these impacts to people and nature will be greatly
magnified if the new-terrain highway promoter's primary objective, to
develop
lands that are not now accessible, is realized.
Concerns
now being raised by the new terrain
highway's
promoters that Crane Naval Weapons Ammunition Depot may be closed if
I-69 is
not built near it are a scare tactic that is in fact opposite the truth. Crane is thriving and increasing in
employment and importance. Most
military base closures, however, have occurred on or near interstates. It is urban sprawl and development
around military bases, the very objective of the new-terrain highway
promoters,
that puts bases at greater risk of closure.
In short,
numerous publicly funded studies have
found that
there are no legitimate reasons for spending $2.5 billion public tax
dollars to
build I-69 on new terrain between Indianapolis and Evansville.
The
public knows it and is angry that both major
political
parties in Indiana are ignoring this reality. We
have vastly outnumbered those supporting the new terrain
I-69 route in every comment period that has occurred for this project. In the latest comment period on the
EIS, for every one person who wrote in favor of the new terrain
highway,
fifteen wrote against it!
Governor
Kernan, we don't understand you. We don't understand why you are
supporting
the new terrain highway or why our views matter so little to you.
But we are not going to let the next
Indiana governor, whoever he is, treat us this way.
The citizens will not be ignored any longer.
We will fight any initiative to fund
this outrageous and unjustified highway at any level and in every hall
of
government. And we will hold our
political officials fully accountable for the actions they take or
don't take
on this issue so vitally important to our lives.
|