.... |
On
November 7th in a 19 page comment to the DEIS the the EPA requested further
consideration of US-41 and I-70 and announced unwillingness to issue permit
for routes 3, 4, & 5 to pass through the Patoka Wildlife Preserve a
forested wetland .
Calling this "routine", INDOT scrambled; November 13th, 2002, six days after the end of the public comment period, INDOT reacted with the "hybrid" route. It is their effort to save Bloomington alternatives #3B & #3C. |
![]() |
| The "hybrid" route #3 to Bloomington, begins as the route previously used by Alternative 2 heading north from I-64 to above Vincennes along US 41. At IN-67 the route parallels IN 67 then cuts due east on yet to be studied new-terrain along the Daviess / Greene county line. |
| Alternative # | Total Length in Miles | Time Savings in minutes
compared to "no build" |
Time Savings
Alt. #1 as base |
Time savings as % of
pre hybrid |
| 1 | 154 - 156 | 11 to 12 | 0 | 100% |
| 3B | 140 - 143 | 24 to 29 | 13 to 17 | N/A |
| 3C | 140 - 143 | 21 to 26 | 10 to 14 | N/A |
| hybrid B estimates * | 150 -156 | 15 to 18 | 4 to 6 | 62.5% |
| hybrid C estimates * | 150 - 156 | 13 to 16 | 2 to 4 | 62% |
We have corrected the graph below with added red bars to reflect the decrease in hours saved with the hybrid 3B and hybrid 3C routes.**
| These performances are shown as:
hybrid 3B-- 4500 hours x 62.5% = 2812.5 hours saved. INDOT is
assuming 11,250 trucks per day on this route.**
|
| Alternative one:11 minutes saved by 10909 trucks per day = 2000 hours
saved. Thus:
hybrid 3B: 15 min saved by 10908 trucks = 2727 hrs./ day
click here to see this fairly represented with a blue bar on the same chart ** |
Of great concern to COUNT US!, INDOT and the DEIS has totally biased the study to not care about People, Homes and Neighborhoods, but if such things matter to you join COUNT US!
COUNT US! Thanks The Association of Monroe County Taxpayers for the use of this photo capture of INDOT's Total Business Relocations for each Alternative. Alternative 3A would be similarly impacted, but is not considered since it has been called "not preferred".
For a calculation of the 8333 hr/ day loss of time for area residents crossing I-69, see the comments of COUNT US! director John Smith.
For an explanation of how all of the benefits are made to look more significant with tricks of graphs see the comments of Smart Mobility.